Ashes 2010: What’s Gone Right for Australia

5 Flares 5 Flares ×

Matthew Wood, of Balanced Sports, tackles what you think would be quite a scarce feature – what’s gone right for Australia – in a lot of detail.

These are dark times for the Rebel Alliance. After the attack on the Death Star… No, hang on, that’s The Empire Strikes Back.

The reference may be valid anyway. One team has dominated the other so far this Ashes series and since Australia’s crushing defeat at Hoth – sorry, Adelaide – and Simon Katich being frozen in carbonite – err, pulling up lame with achilles trouble – it appears as dark a time as can be remembered for the Australians. (I’m not suggesting England are actually evil, just dominant like the Empire were in the real Star Wars trilogy).

So without hint of jingoism it’s time to examine after two Tests – one lamentably poor, the other suffering from one poor innings – what the Australians have done well through the start of this Ashes campaign. Obviously with Australian down 1 – 0 and with strife consuming the Baggy Green camp, the positives may be harder to find than negatives. To use Ricky Ponting’s words – There are positives. To say what Ponting does not forces one to add – Australia is simply the inferior team this year. Although there are the following seven positives, it’s unfortunate they come from a talent-deprived team and are overshadowed by negatives.

Nevertheless, on the plus side for the Australians are:

Mike Hussey’s return to form

“Mr. Cricket” has been a millstone around Aussie necks for nigh-upon two years now, sprinkling poor performances with rigid batsmanship and an occasional impressive One-Day innings. He only made it into the First Test team by way of Khawaja and Ferguson failing to impress, yet has responded brilliantly: he’s stroke-played, rather than ground out his scores. And best of all: he’s the likeable Mike Hussey that Australia rallies around.

The Return of the Peter Siddle we all know and love

Peter Siddle’s first innings hat-trick in Brisbane generated more hype than The Oprah Winfrey Show, yet in two subsequent innings he’s been unable to reproduce the same bite and venom. That’s not particularly surprising given his history of taking only a few wickets interspersed with occasional Michelles at Test level. What he does offer is abrasiveness, consistency – you know what you’re going to get – and an optimism currently lacking in Mitchell Johnson’s cricket.

Mitchell Johnson’s omission from the Second Test

Harsh? No, not really. Because where we are as a cricket-playing nation is dependent on the whims and fragile confidence of Jess Bratich’s boyfriend. When firing, Johnson is on a level with Dale Steyn as the best, most hostile fast men around. He was dropped for lack of form, but not discarded as having played out his usefulness like Jason Gillespie five years ago. His not playing in Adelaide hopefully will provide enough spark for him to rediscover his best form, but statements like “I need to get my head right” aren’t inspiring – frankness regarding one’s headspace just show how low confidence is, and how far one has to come to get back to full mental fitness.

Shane Watson’s leadership

Hussey and Shane Watson, more than Ricky Ponting and much more than Michael Clarke have said what his team and the cricketing public of Australia have needed to hear: Australia have been second-best throughout this series. This comes from a man who two years ago I would have bet had played nearly his last Test for the Aussies and had less leadership ability than lettuce. Now an automatic selection, perhaps his nascent leadership ability could be used in the national setup.

Marcus North’s failures at no. 6

Although affable, elegant and good captaincy material, Marcus North simply doesn’t have what it takes to be a World Class number six batsman. Oh, for the days of Martin Love! Change is now inevitable at this position, and with North’s career. That he has failed three times in three innings when Australia has needed him to fire means that he’s now had enough chances. Only Simon Katich’s injury – meaning Australia would perhaps take two “newbies” into the Third Test – may have saved his spot. An alternative: given Phil Hughes’ shaky start to the Sheffield Shield season and North’s past-life as an opener, it may be time to move him up the order to start the innings alongside Watson.

Brad Haddin

Personal opinion in cricketing circles vacillates between maintaining Haddin as ‘keeper or going back to Tim Paine. Paine’s injury obviously now precludes this, but so to does the form of the New South Welshman. Only two months ago he was a fading light but his application with the bat has earned him new respect.

The selectors’ willingness to experiment

Xavier Doherty and Ryan Harris, two players who only three years ago were middle-of-the-road Sheffield Shield players are now Australian representatives, conjuring up memories of Simon Cook, Scott Muller and Matt Nicholson. But let’s not forget that England have gotten their current attack to this quality by trying and discarding Sajid Mahmood, (Australia’s) Darren Pattison, James Tredwell, Amjad Khan, Jon Lewis, Liam Plunkett, Shaun Udal and Ian Blackwell. In five years. Greg Chappell upset the Indian applecart by attempting to usher through new blood and it would seem he’s intent on the same course as an Australian selector. All is not lost, Australia.

The battle is not yet half over. Given the disparity in consistent quality between the bowling attacks, Adelaide may well have always been the Test they were most likely to lose: it was where, should the bats fail, the bowlers would have the greatest difficulty getting them out of a mess.  Shane Watson could slide easily into that role also.

But as a hopeful Return of the Jedi moment approaches for Australia as they move towards Perth, Melbourne and Sydney. It may be that Michael Clarke steps up to play Luke Skywalker (the one who’s ostensibly the hero but still everyone thinks is a prat).The men in the Baggy Green would do well to focus on what they are doing well, rather than looking pessimistically at what they aren’t doing.

Liked this post? You should subscribe to our email updates - why subscribe.



  1. Allan R says

    Probably the best thing to happen in the apparently sudden realisation that we are not a better side than englan, well the side selected. This must have been writen prior to the announcements but the incluseion of steve smith is a step forward, although they are doing it arse about picking him to replace noths as a batsman. Unless they have realised you need to take 20 wickets to win a match, and we havn’t taken 20 wickets between 2. The selcection of Beer based on form is admition that we are well scewed, and looks like we are finally entering a rebuilding phase after needing it for 3 years. I still dissagree with phil hughes’s being the next opener, Having been in the same cricket club as phil the year before he left for sydney, I can tell you he’s technically rubbish, He needs to work on a few things before playing international cricket again, not saying he can’t do the job but I feel he needs more 1st class time to improve and prove that he can play the ball off the body/head. His partner Phill Jaques is the obvious selection for mine.

    Brad haddin, Yeah he’s scored some runs but how many has he cost with his 3 dropped catches? I’ not saying keepers can’t ever drop a catch, it will happen but he has no footwork, which means he cannot cover ground, turning 2 step catches into full stretch diving efforts, He also stands back too far as you will have seen over the last few years forcing the slips into alot of 1 bounce pickups, You don’t keep where the rising ball carries to, you keep to the low one, with an edge taking it’s pace off, he’s usually 2m too deep, if you have watched the channel 9 coverage over the time of him playing you’ll have head healy comment on it several times.

    All in all we don’t have the better side, we seem to be starting to rebuild now, unfortunately I fear the selectors will go the other way now, throwing player after player to the lions and dropping them before finding their feet,

    My team for the Wacca is as follows.

    Phill Jaques (1st class ave:49.88, Tests 47.44)
    Phil Hughes (Replacing katitch for his injury, I know I said he’s not good enough but he’s still the 2nd best opener we have)
    Ricky Ponting (If he loses this series, and doesn’t score runs I fear he may be given a nudge, I don’t like him as skipper but as a batsman he’s a phenomenon)
    Micheal Clarke (hopefully he’ll keep the for he was stating to have in adelades 2nd innings)
    Mike Hussey (Never in doubt)
    Shane Watson (We need him to bowl, he also seems incapable of making those hundreds at the top, he’s done a bang up job opening but his mind and body can’t do both for long periods)
    Graham Manou (Used to be haddins understudy prior to paine, although seems to be forgotten, not a great batsban but a fantastic gloveman)
    Steve Smith (You could pick Beer or the forgotten Jason Krejza)
    Ben Hilfenhaus
    Stuart Clarke (still the nearest thing to Glen Mcgrath I have ever seen)
    Doug Bollinger

    I’m not saying that team will win the ashed, england is on a high and on their way up the rankings, but it might give us a chance. and more importantly, it’s a much younger side with a few years in it, and if they don’t perform by all means remove them and give some 20 year olds a chance. The guys who I remember being 20 odd and being dropped only to come back later (yes re selected something we don’t seem capable of anymore) in the last 20 years.
    Steve waugh
    Mark waugh
    Justin Langer
    Mathew Hayden
    Ricky Ponting
    Damien Martin
    Jason Gillespie
    Michael Kasprowicz
    Greg Blewett
    Paul Riefel

    Pretty handy bunch of guys to drop and bring back. We need to give the youg guys a go, if they underpeform then drop them, if they then play well again for their state give em another go, if ther’s a spot, or even if they just seem to be plain old better then the guy who’s there.
    Michael Slater
    Andy Bichel

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *